Stratford v Auto Trail VR Ltd [2016]
Decision Number:
Published on: 19/01/2017
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background

The employee in this case hardly had an exemplary record. In fact, he had been involved in 18 'serious discussions' about his poor performance over the years and was late on the day of his final disciplinary hearing because he went for a cigarette in case the hearing overlapped his morning break.

The key question was whether expired warnings could be taken into account when dismissing him for another serious offence - using his mobile phone on the shop floor. This falls under the GB legislation of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and, in particular, section 98 (4) i.e. having established a valid reason for dismissal (in this case, conduct) has been given by an employer, a tribunal must

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 19/01/2017