Q&A: Can dismissal for sickness absence be fair?
Published on: 23/07/2026
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Madison Bowyer Associate in the Employment Law Group of Arthur Cox NI

Stay ahead of the curve with our exclusive Q&A series, brought to you by leading law firm, Arthur Cox, LLP, designed to answer your most pressing legal questions. These expert insights provide clear guidance to ensure your HR practices remain compliant and protect your organisation.  

This month's question:

Can dismissal for sickness absence be fair?

Capability is a potentially fair reason for dismissal under Article 130(2)(a) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (the “1996 Order”). This includes situations where, due to illness, an employee is no longer capable of performing the role for which they were employed. 

Employers would normally be expected to allow a reasonable amount of time for the employee to recover from their illness. The amount of time can depend on various factors including how long it will take the employee to recover, the degree of certainty that the employee will recover, how easy it is to get cover and whether or not the job can be kept open.
To establish that the dismissal is fair, employers should regularly consult with the employee, obtain appropriate medical evidence, consider the impact on the business, explore alternatives to dismissal and assess any requirement to make reasonable adjustments under disability discrimination legislation (where applicable).

Under Article 140 of the 1996 Order, an employee must have been continuously employed for a period of one year in order to bring forward a claim for unfair dismissal in NI. However, the qualifying period does not apply to discrimination claims. Accordingly, where an employee’s illness amounts to a disability, a dismissal connected to sickness absence may still be challenged.

Ultimately, whether a dismissal for sickness absence is fair will depend on the facts of the case and whether the employer has acted reasonably in all the circumstances.

This article was provided by Madison Bowyer, an Associate in the Employment Law Group at Arthur Cox NI. 

T:+44 28 9026 5886 
E: Madison.bowyer@arthurcox.com 
https://www.arthurcox.com/ 

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 23/07/2026