Ministry of Justice v Dodds [2023]
Decision Number: EAT 31 Legal Body: Employment Appeal Tribunal (England & Wales)
Published on: 22/03/2023
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Associate Head of School of Law, Ulster University
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Associate Head of School of Law, Ulster University
Jason elliott new
LinkedIn

Jason Elliott was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2013 and is the Associate Head of School of Law at Ulster University.  As a practising barrister, he has developed a largely civil practice representing individuals, companies and public bodies in litigation. This covers a wide range of areas including personal injuries, wills and employment law. In terms of employment law, he has represented both applicants and respondents in the Industrial Tribunal.   At Ulster University, Jason lectures extensively on the civil areas of practise such as Equity and Trusts and delivers employment law lectures for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Appellants:
Ministry of Justice
Respondents:
Dodds
Summary

The EAT held that salaried judges could not be both full-time and part-time workers when “sitting up”, overturning the Tribunal’s finding of less favourable treatment and remitting the case for further fact-finding.

Background

Background:

The claimants were full-time salaried judges at various levels.  On occasion, the judges were asked to ‘sit up’ in higher roles.  They received no additional remuneration with it being regarded as part of their salaried role.  The claim was that they were part-time workers when they acted up and that they should not be treated less favourably than their full-time comparators in those higher roles.  As a result, they sought the higher rate of pay when they sat-up.

Outcome:

The Tribunal, at first instance, found

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 22/03/2023