This is a relatively long decision reflecting the many issues raised by the complainant as discriminatory. The complainant, a Nigerian, was employed by the respondent between September 2006 and December 2009. During that period she availed of two periods of statutory maternity leave, totalling in excess of one year. The complainant asserted that:

* she was told she would be promoted but subsequently was not
* that her security access was reduced, 
* that the appraisal mark assigned to her, 
* that being placed on a PIP, 
* being refused access to training
* her selection for redundancy
* her appeal of her redundancy
* the requirement for a compromise agreement to receive an ex gratia payment
* being