SPI Spirits (UK) Ltd v Zabelin [2023]
Decision Number: EAT 147 Legal Body: Employment Appeal Tribunal (England & Wales)
Published on: 17/07/2025
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Louise McAloon Partner, Worthingtons Solicitors
Louise McAloon Partner, Worthingtons Solicitors
Louise mcaloon

Louise leads and manages the employment department, which is currently the largest employment law practice in Northern Ireland.

With over 18 years’ experience in employment law, Louise’s knowledge and attention to detail provide an innovative approach that her clients appreciate in relation to complex areas of Public Interest Disclosure, Equal Pay, Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal.  She works closely with employers across the public, private and third sectors and regularly advises on restructuring issues including individual and collective redundancies and the application and implication of TUPE. Louise has a detailed understanding of her clients’ needs and is known for her constructive and pragmatic advice on internal employment issues and providing advice and representation in defence of all categories of employment claims before the tribunals and civil courts.

Appellants:
SPI Spirits (UK) Ltd
Respondent:
Zabelin
Summary

The EAT dismissed the appeal, rejecting the appellants’ interpretation and ruling the contractual cap unenforceable due to statutory restrictions on waiving employment rights.

Background

Vladislav Zabelin, the claimant, was an employee of SPI Spirits (UK) Limited, the first respondent. He was dismissed by Yuri Shefler, the second respondent and the first respondent’s agent, after making protected disclosures about pay cuts and alleged misuse of the COVID-19 pandemic for company profit.

By a reserved decision on liability sent to the parties on 1 December 2021, the tribunal found that 1) The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the 1st respondent contrary to section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, 2) The principal reason for the claimant’s disclosure was that he

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 17/07/2025