MN v NHS Foundation Trust L [2026]
Decision Number: EWCA Civ 71 Legal Body: Court of Appeal (England and Wales)
Published on: 07/04/2026
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Associate Head of School of Law, Ulster University
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Associate Head of School of Law, Ulster University
Jason elliott new
LinkedIn

Jason Elliott was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2013 and is the Associate Head of School of Law at Ulster University.  As a practising barrister, he has developed a largely civil practice representing individuals, companies and public bodies in litigation. This covers a wide range of areas including personal injuries, wills and employment law. In terms of employment law, he has represented both applicants and respondents in the Industrial Tribunal.   At Ulster University, Jason lectures extensively on the civil areas of practise such as Equity and Trusts and delivers employment law lectures for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Claimant/Respondent on Appeal:
MN (Anonymised)
Defendant/Appellant on Appeal:
NHS Foundation Trust L (also anonymised)
Summary

Policy relating to disciplinary process was incorporated into the contract and a breach of it was found in terms of the investigation of the claimant.

Background

The trust was investigating a complaint that the claimant, a consultant, had broken patient confidentiality. The claimant argued that his employment contract required the trust’s Medical Director to act as the case manager for the investigation. However, the Medical Director had delegated the role to the Director of Corporate Affairs.

The contract stated that disciplinary procedure would be in line with the Maintaining Higher Professional Standards framework and it stated that the medical director would act as the case manager in cases involving, among other things, consultants.  There was also a policy document within the Trust which stated the same.

Outcome

At first instance, the High Court found that the policy had been incorporated into the claimant’s employment contract and it created a mandatory obligation on the medical director to investigate the case.  The Trust appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court was correct in finding that the policy had been incorporated into the employment contract. The policy was given its natural meaning, the language was suitable for contractual obligation and for someone as senior as a consultant it was important that the investigator would be someone of senior status.  The Trust argued that it could have created micro-management of the employment relationship but this was not accepted by the Court of Appeal.  The court found that if the term was such that it would make it unworkable then it would be for the parties to agree a modification.

Practical Guidance

This case demonstrates the extent to which there can be the incorporation of frameworks and policies within the contract of employment and as a result create rights that can be relied upon by employees. In this case, it was the disciplinary policy and who was required to oversee the investigation and that it could not be delegated. This should be taken into account by employers to ensure that they are looking at policies as a whole which may form part of the employment relationship rather than merely looking at the contract in isolation to view the responsibilities and duties.

You can read the case in full here.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 07/04/2026