Osoba v The Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary  UKEAT/0055/13/BAPosted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality
The Claimant was approaching 30 years service as a police officer with the Respondent and therefore was eligible to retire. It was necessary to make redundancies and/or redeployments and the Claimant was asked if he was thinking of retiring and, if not, whether he wanted to stay in his current role or be redeployed. The Claimant said he wanted to stay. The Claimant was made redundant after he scored less than others when tested against a matrix of skills. The Claimant brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal against the Respondent for age discrimination. He contended that the matrix was deliberately manipulated to secure the result that he would obtain fewer points than colleagues and
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.