K for King Security v HM Revenue & CustomsPosted in : Essential Guide to Employment Contracts on 14 June 2011
Kiera Lee, writes:
King Security v HM Revenue & Customs  NIIT 1782 10IT – Paying Apprentices
Research has shown that employers feel that having an apprentice in your organisation leads to greater efficiency and productivity and reduces staff turnover. Before hiring an apprentice businesses need to be aware of the applicable law.
King Security appealed to a tribunal against a Notice of Underpayment served by HMRC under the provisions of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The basis of the appeal was that the appellant was not under an obligation to pay the worker, Mr McComb, the national minimum wage (NMW) on the grounds that Mr McComb was employed under a contract of
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
This article is correct at 06/08/2015
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.