Thomas v Surrey & Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust & Another [2024]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
EAT 141 -
Legal Body
Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Discrimination
Background:
The claimant was engaged through an agency to deliver consultancy services for the respondent Trust. This was from April to July in 2018. In July the claimant was notified that his assignment was terminated as it had come to light that he had an unspent conviction which he had failed to declare. The claimant asserted that the real reason was that he had stood for political office for the English Democrats, and it was due to his philosophical belief which he described as ‘English Nationalism’.
The respondent denied this, stating that the termination was due to misleading information on his CV, and they also argued that his philosophical belief was not protected by
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.