Moon v Slater & Gordon UK Ltd [2024]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
EAT 144 -
Legal Body
Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Dismissal, Redundancy, Pay
Background:
The claimant had been employed by the respondent, a solicitors firm, as a costs resolution manager. He was made redundant in late 2018 following an efficiency review. The claimant brought three claims to the Tribunal. This related to unfair dismissal citing the redundancy as a sham, unlawful deductions as he said he was entitled to bonuses in full and harassment relating to a telephone call with managers. This related to an accusation made to him of insubordination and that he had to decide ‘on the spot’ whether he was fit to work.
Outcome:
At first instance, the Tribunal found in the claimant’s favour only in relation to the unfair dismissal
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.
Jason Elliott BL
Barrister
The main content of this article was provided by Jason Elliott BL. Email jasondelliott@outlook.com
View all articles by Jason Elliott BL