Groom v Maritime and Coastguard Agency [2024]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
EAT 71 -
Legal Body
Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Contracts of Employment
Summary Description:
A volunteer was found to be a worker as a result of the contract between the parties and the provision of personal service.
Background:
The respondent is responsible for civil maritime search and rescue. It is made up of 108 employed staff and 3500 volunteer Coastal Rescue Officers. The claimant was one of these Volunteer Coastal Rescue Officers having been so since 1985. In May 2020 the claimant was invited to a disciplinary meeting and his membership of the Coastguard Rescue Service was terminated. The actual issue arising was the employment status of the claimant as having worker status would
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.