Zaka v Weetabix Ltd [2023]

Posted In: Case Law
  • Decision Number
  • Legal Body
    Employment Tribunal (ET)
  • Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Issues covered: Disability Discrimination


The claimant was firstly employed by the respondent as a Production Operator before being promoted to the position of Technical Operator. At the time of hearing he was still in employment with the respondent. 

The claimant was disabled at all material times by reason of back problems in that he had bulging discs. The claimant was advised to shield through the pandemic due to taking immunosuppressant injections as part of his treatment. The claimant used his entitlement to Company Sick Pay when he was shielding as well as time taken off following an operation to his back.   The claimant asserted that he was unaware that the Company Sick Pay policy was

Already a subscriber?

Click here to login and access the full article.

Don't miss out, register today!

Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.

Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe

24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues

Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law

Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors

Already a subscriber, now or Register

This article is correct at 11/10/2023

The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.

Jason Elliott BL

The main content of this article was provided by Jason Elliott BL. Email

View all articles by Jason Elliott BL