Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and Anor [2023]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
UKSC 43 -
Legal Body
Uk Supreme Court (UKSC) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Contracts of Employment, Collective and Trade Union Issues
Background:
The background is that many riders of the respondent joined the claimant, an independent Trade Union, which sought to negotiate on behalf of riders. The respondent refused to enter into collective bargaining negotiations. This led to a decision by the Central Arbitration Committee focusing on whether the members were ‘workers’ within the meaning of Section 296 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal came to the conclusion that the riders were not workers but were, in fact, self-employed. This was appealed to the Supreme Court.
Outcome:
The
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.