Kaul v Ministry of Justice 
Decision NumberEAT 41
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
In 2019 the claimant raised grievances about other judges and court staff. The grievances related to events starting in 2015. In 2020 the grievance was dismissed as being out of time under the policy. The claimant then commenced proceedings stating that there was a failure to deal with the grievance in a reasonable time, she should not have been asked to provide a schedule listing the complaints and that they were not out of time.
The respondent sought to strike out the claim and in part this was allowed. The Tribunal struck out all of the claims with the exception of the one which related to the decision not to determine the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.