Ajaz v Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EAT 142
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
EAT 142 -
Legal Body
Employment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Whistleblowing (Protected Disclosures), Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
Background:
The claimant brought claims against the respondent in 2017 on the basis that she had been subject to detriment as a result of protected disclosures that had been made. The case in 2017 was settled under an ACAS COT3 agreement. Within that agreement it stated that the claimant would not re-litigate the complaints in the proceedings. In 2021 the claimant brought further proceedings against the respondent citing new detriments but relating to the original disclosures. She contended that the detriment took place after the COT3 Agreement. The issue was whether the claimant could bring the claim.
Outcome:
The Tribunal, at first instance,
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.