Thukalil v Puthenveettil Posted In: Case Law
Decision NumberEAT 47
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality, Pay
The claimant was a domestic worker in the respondent’s home from 2005 to 2013. The National Minimum Wage Regulation 1999 (Regulation) outlined that such domestic workers were exempt and therefore not entitled to the minimum wage. This was challenged on the grounds that the Regulation was indirectly discriminatory against women and contrary to EU law.
The Tribunal, at first instance, held that the Regulation was indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of sex, and it was not a proportionate way in achieving the aim which related to a live-in worker being treated as a family member. The Tribunal further concluded that the Regulation was contrary to the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.