Bahad v HSBC Bank Plc Posted In: Case Law
Decision NumberEAT 83
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality, Policies and Procedures, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimant began working for the respondent in 2019. His contract was terminated, with notice, in 2020. He brought claims alleging that his manager behaved in a way to ‘frustrate’ his work and forced him to leave before making a reason up to have his contract terminated. The claimant represented himself. The claimant alleged that he had raised concerns through the whistleblowing team. The issue arising relating to this appeal was the procedural aspects at the Employment Tribunal.
A Preliminary Case Management Hearing was arranged to take place by telephone in September 2020. The parties provided their agendas for the hearing with
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.