The Harpur Trust v Brazel Posted In: Case Law
Decision NumberUKSC 21
Legal BodyUK Supreme Court / House of Lords (UKSC/UKHL)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionContracts of Employment, Working Time, Pay
The claimant, a visiting music teacher on a permanent contract, worked during term time. She worked on average 32 weeks per year (which fluctuated based upon the number of children enrolled). The issue arose in relation to holiday entitlement. The respondent (appellant) Trust used ACAS Guidance and paid her one third of 12.07% of her overall earnings. The claimant argued that it was not lawful with the Working Time Regulations. Instead, she argued that she should receive the average weekly remuneration for the previous twelve weeks.
Both the EAT and the Court of Appeal agreed with the claimant with Underhill LJ stating that the Working Time Regulations 1998 did not allow for
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.