Yule v Health Hut Professional Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Tribunal (ET)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Policies and Procedures
The claimant commenced her employment, as a pharmacy assistant, in October 2017. One of the directors of the respondent, Mr Shah, received an anonymous online complaint about his pharmacy. The complaint centred upon how a customer was spoken to by a female member of staff but there were no details given which would identify the staff member. This came through the NHS and Mr Shah did not respond until he was subsequently contacted for a response. Mr Shah spoke to the pharmacist on the day in question. This involved a telephone call the claimant had taken where the customer was being difficult and the claimant’s tone had been ‘raised’ slightly.
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.