Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd [2022]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
EWCA Civ 1600 -
Legal Body
England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Discrimination
The claimant appealed against a decision to strike out his victimisation claim against the respondent. The basis for the claim being struck out was that the claim fell within a widely drafted COT3 settlement agreement between the parties.
The claimant was only in employment with the respondent for one month. In March 2018 there was a settlement through the COT3 settlement agreement form. It stated that it was ‘full and final settlement of all claims of any kind whatsoever, wheresoever and howsoever arising directly or indirectly out of or in connection with the claimant’s employment with the respondent…’ In May 2018 the claimant brought a further claim against the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.
Jason Elliott BL
Barrister
The main content of this article was provided by Jason Elliott BL. Email jasondelliott@outlook.com
View all articles by Jason Elliott BL