Anghel v Middlesex University Posted In: Case Law
Decision NumberEAT 176
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimant, a litigant in person, brought claims of unfair dismissal and harassment against the respondent. This claim was dismissed and the Tribunal refused her application for reconsideration.
The claimant sought to appeal to the EAT. She filed an appeal notice via email on 9th February 2021. There are 42 days given to submit an appeal which would have expired on 16th February. The appeal notice, however, did not attach the grounds of her claim. The claimant was contacted on 16th February being informed that her attachments could not be opened and they would have to be resent. She resent those attachments and the next day she was informed that the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.