TYU v ILA Spa Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionHuman Rights, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The appellant here, a third party to the original proceedings, appealed against the refusal to order anonymisation for her in relation to her name being within a published judgment. The issue arose from a claim brought by two claimants against the respondent. The third party worked the respondent but had resigned and decided not to attend the disciplinary hearing relating to the two claimants. The case against the claimants was based upon dishonesty. The third party was related to the claimants and had provided two documents in support of the claimants. At first instance, the respondent had made claims of dishonesty against the third party and the Judge named the third party in the judgment
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.