MacLeod v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Tribunal (ET)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Discipline and Grievance, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimant was employed by the respondent from 20th December 2013. The claimant was regularly promoted and during her time with the respondent she was department manager and assistant manager before becoming store manager on 1st July 2019. The particular aspect of the Contract of Employment which became relevant in this case was:
‘You are required to work your working hours each week (excluding meal breaks) and to make yourself available work the Working Days…The times you are required to work your Working Hours will vary each week. You will be required to work such times as notified to you in advance by your line manager.’
In practice, the claimant was responsible
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.