Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionWorking Time, Pay, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues, Leave
The claimant worked as a plumbing and heating engineer for the respondent company. The respondent contended that the appellant was a self-employed independent contractor without entitlement to paid annual leave. The claimant had taken unpaid annual leave, and this led to a series of cases against the respondent. In related hearings, the Supreme Court held that those individuals were workers (see Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith  UKSC 29) rather than independent contractors. The claimant’s holiday pay claim then returned to the Tribunal but it was dismissed on the basis that it was out of time. The Tribunal did not consider the CJEU decision in King v
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.