Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Collective and Trade Union Issues
The claimant was the workplace representative for her trade union. As part of that role, she was involved in organising strikes. She was subsequently suspended from work and faced disciplinary action.
The argument by the claimant was that she was subjected to a detriment as a result of trade union activities. Section 146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 [the GB equivalent of A.73 of the Employment Rights (NI) Order 1996 in NI] seeks to protect workers against detriment in relation to participation in trade union membership and activities.
The ET held that Section 146 worked in a way to protect workers against detriment
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.