Rumbold v Jaguar Land Rover Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Tribunal (ET)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal, Sickness and Absence
The claimant was employed by the respondent car manufacturer from 1999 until his dismissal in December 2018. He had worked in various car assembly roles. In terms of the background to the dismissal, there was little by way of dispute substantively. The claimant had a significant amount of absences during his 19 years working for the respondent. He had over 808 shifts that he had missed which was calculated as costing the company in £95,860 in sick pay. Indeed, the Tribunal noted that the respondent had a very generous sick pay scheme for a private employer.
There were various reasons throughout the years for the absences but in most years the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.