Queensgate Investments LLP & Others v Millet Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimant was employed by the respondent, a private equity firm, as Head of Acquisitions. He was employed from September 2017 until he was dismissed on the grounds of redundancy in October 2020. He had brought a claim outlining that he had been automatically unfairly dismissed based upon protected disclosures that he had made. The disclosures related to sexist, racist and homophobic language as well as purported breaches of fiduciary duty and fraud by the respondent.
The issue that came before the EAT here was the interim relief application brought by the claimant. The respondent argued that the interim hearing should be conducted in private to restrict the public
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.