Syndicat CFTC du personnel de la Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle v Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle Posted In: Case Law
Decision NumberC-463/19, CJEU (First Chamber)
Legal BodyCourt of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality, Family Friendly Rights
CY, a male employee, was engaged by CPAM to work as a benefits inspector in the employee or executive category. CY is the father of a child born in April 2016 and, on that basis, he applied for the leave provided for in CPAM’s collective agreement, under which, on expiry of the leave provided for in Article 45 of that collective agreement, an employee who is bringing up “her child on her own” is to be entitled successively to leave of three months on half-pay or to leave of one and a half months on full pay and to unpaid leave of one year.
CPAM refused to grant CY’s application on the ground that the leave provided for in Article 46 of the collective agreement is reserved to
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.