Sir Benjamin Slade Baronet & Anor v Biggs & Others Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeals Tribunal (EAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Discrimination and Equality, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimants in this case notified their employer, the appellant in this case, that they were pregnant. The respondent found that the pregnancies were inconvenient and then instigated action to try and force the claimants out of their employment. The Tribunal at first instance found in favour of the claimants relating to discrimination on grounds of pregnancy, constructive unfair dismissal and a failure to comply with Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. Both claimants were awarded compensation relating to the claims brought. The issue arising is that they were given uplifts of 25% relating to the loss of statutory rights vis-à-vis unfair
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.