Llewellyn v Oyster Bay Systems Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Tribunal (ET)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
This was a preliminary hearing on whether correspondence between the parties should be regarded as inadmissible due to the ‘without prejudice rule’. The claimant was employed by the respondent, a small technology company, as the Human Resources and Recruitment Co-Ordinator. After some family issues, an external Managing Director was appointed in 2019 and this is when the claimant alleges that there was maltreatment leading to sickness and never returning to work. When the claimant was off work, the external Managing Director was removed and the family members were reinstated.
The issue arose from a letter from the family director, Michael Breach, to the claimant in June
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.