Fotheringhame v Barclays Services Ltd [2020]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
UKEAT/0208/19/BA -
Legal Body
Employment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Dismissal
In August 2018 the claimant won their unfair dismissal claim against the respondent and received an order from the Tribunal for re-engagement. This was to be implemented by 21st September 2018. The order also included the respondent to pay the claimant in respect of any benefit they would have expected to receive but for the dismissal taking place.
A remedy hearing was held on foot of the failure by the Respondent to re-engage the claimant and he was awarded £950,000. The claimant then sought interest upon that award. This was refused by the Tribunal at first instance on the basis that a re-engagement order under Section 115 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.
Jason Elliott BL
Barrister
The main content of this article was provided by Jason Elliott BL. Email jasondelliott@outlook.com
View all articles by Jason Elliott BL