Patel v City of Wolverhampton College Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionRedundancy, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimant was employed by the respondent as a lecturer from January 2003 to 31st March 2014. She taught a number of courses in the beauty division of the respondent. In 2014 it was announced that there would be a restructuring of the beauty department. Following the process, the claimant was not offered a role in the restructured department and was dismissed on 31st March 2014. She appealed this internally and was unsuccessful.
The EAT outlined that this case had a long and somewhat unique procedural history (which was the primary issue in the appeal). There was an unsuccessful conciliation period before the ET1 form
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.