Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd & Royal Mail Group Ltd v Kocur & Ors Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionA-Typical Working, Pay
The claimant was an agency worker employed by Angard Staffing, whose sole client was the Royal Mail. The claimant commenced this work in January 2015 and only worked for the Royal Mail throughout his employment. The claimant brought claims on the basis of the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 and the issue to be dealt with by the court was whether he met the definition in Regulation 3.
Regulation 3 states: In these Regulations “agency worker” means an individual who -
(a) is supplied by a temporary work agency to work temporarily for and under the supervision and direction of a hirer; and
(b) has a contract with the temporary work agency which is—
(i) a contract of employment with the agency,
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.