Chowdhury v Marsh Farm Futures Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Discipline and Grievance
The claimant had brought various claims against the respondent which most notably included a claim for unfair dismissal. All of these claims were rejected by the Employment Tribunal at first instance when the claimant had represented himself. This case was an appeal on the grounds that the Employment Tribunal had failed to adjourn the case as a result of the claimant’s health concerns at the hearing itself. A second ground of appeal was that there was an error in law by stating the procedural defects in the dismissal had been remedied due to the substantial merits of the respondent’s case.
In terms of the first ground of appeal, it was directly relating to the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.