Okwu v Rise Community Action Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Whistleblowing (Protected Disclosures)
The claimant had completed three months’ work for the Respondent and was informed that her probationary period would be extended by three months to allow for her suitability to be assessed. This period of time is well short of the 2 year period of employment requirement to obtain the right not to be unfairly dismissed in England and Wales under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (1 year in Northern Ireland under Article 140 of the Employment Rights (NI) Order 1996).
Shortly after the extension of the probationary period the claimant was dismissed for myriad issues, including unsatisfactory work performance and unacceptable conduct. She argued that
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.