Carole Ritchie v Tesco Stores Limited 2019Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyNorthern Ireland Industrial Tribunal (NIIT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTransfer Regulations (TUPE), Contracts of Employment, Pay and Conditions of Employment
This recently reported case concerns the correct calculation for ‘frozen holiday pay’. Ms Ritchie worked for Stewarts Supermarkets Ltd (SSL) from 1988 and in 1998 the Company was acquired by Tesco. Ms Ritche had accrued 25 days holiday pay under the Stewarts Supermarkets scheme and upon transfer to Tesco these days were ‘frozen’ and employees were told that they would receive payment for these days upon termination of employment at the rate they are then paid.
As part of a move from weekly to monthly paid the Respondent permitted affected employees to ‘cash in’ part of the their frozen holiday leave. Ms Ritchie sought to do this and sought information on the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.