Mervyn v BW Controls Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The claimant had worked for the respondent company for over 10 years and after a series of events culminating in the claimant being accused of lying, she left the employment. The claimant was a litigant in person and in completing the ET1 form stated that she had been unfairly dismissed ‘(including constructive dismissal)’. Furthermore, the particulars attached to the ET1 described a claim of constructive dismissal and she had stated at CMD that she had not resigned.
At hearing, it was found by the Employment Tribunal that the claimant had resigned, especially on the basis that she had not argued the case for constructive dismissal in the ET1. As a result, the claimant appealed
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.