Stefanko and others v Maritime Hotel Ltd and Doherty Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDismissal, Contracts of Employment
The claimants worked as waiting staff and had short periods of employment. All three were dismissed after objecting to “persistent shortfalls in their wages, late payment and a falsification of their wage slips”. They argued that none of them had been provided with a statement of their terms and conditions during the course of their employment or anytime thereafter.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to provide this statement for two claimants but not a third who had only been employed for six weeks. However, the EAT disagreed and ruled that an employee who has more than one but less than two months’ service is entitled to such a statement. The third employee was therefore
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.