Roy Robert Hillerby v Castle Engineering & Construction Company Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Tribunal (ET)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionRedundancy
The claimant worked as a security guard for the respondent which provides security services for the Belfast Telegraph. In 2015, the respondent was informed by its client that it would be selling its building and moving to smaller premises. The implication for the respondent was that the number of security officers would be reduced and redundancies were inevitable.
Staff were asked to reduce hours and were ultimately informed of a redundancy selection process after which the claimant was made redundant. The respondent adopted both ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’ criteria and the claimant had marks deducted for a number of incidents of difficult behaviour and attitude in the recent
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.