Pimlico Plumbers and Anor v Gary Smith [2017]
Posted In: Case Law-
Decision Number
EWCA Civ 51 -
Legal Body
England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Absence and Sickness, Discrimination, Contracts of Employment, Working Time, Tribunal Practice, Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The question on this appeal is whether the Employment Tribunal (“the ET”) was correct to hold in a decision dated 16 April 2012 that the respondent, Gary Smith, was a worker within the meaning of S.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“the ERA”) and regulation 2(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (“the WTR”) and his working situation fell within the definition of “employment” in S.83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010 (“the EA”) during the period that he worked for Pimlico Plumbers Limited (“PP”).
As put by the Master of the Rolls in this Court of Appeal case, "The case puts a spotlight on a business model under which operatives are intended to appear to clients of the business as
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.