Bernard Barlow v Gallahers Limited Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyNI Industrial/Employment Tribunal (NIIET)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionRedundancy, Discrimination and Equality
The claimant, who worked for the respondent for 27 years, argued that he was discriminated against on the grounds of his age after being excluded from an enhanced severance package. The claimant had made his employer aware that he wanted to continue working after his 65th birthday by signing a ‘Retirement Option’ form.
After a global review of its manufacturing operations the respondent announced its intention to close its Ballymena factory with the loss of 850 jobs. The redundancy package was based an earlier contractual redundancy scheme which stated “entitlement… only applies up to age 65” with employees over 65 receiving statutory redundancy pay only. This scheme had not been amended
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.