David McCartney v Mercury Security Management Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyNI Industrial/Employment Tribunal
Type of Claim / JurisdictionContracts of Employment, Pay and Conditions of Employment
The claimant worked for the respondent as a CCTV operator. Since 1 December 2009, relevant CCTV operators are legally obliged to possess a CCTV licence granted by the Security Industry Authority (SIA). The claimant argued that the respondent had failed to pay his SIA licence fee and that he had suffered a financial detriment. The argument was essentially that the respondent’s failure to reimburse the claimant for the fee amounted to an unlawful ‘deduction’ from his ‘wages’.
An arrangement had been put in place for the reimbursement of employees who had paid the fee but left before the expiry
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from Maxine Orr, Partner at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.