USA v Nolan  UKSC63Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyUk Supreme Court (UKSC)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal, Redundancy and Reorganisation
Regular readers will be aware of this long-running case about when the requirement to consult with employee representatives starts - at the time redundancies are proposed or at the point when a decision is being made to effect redundancies. In 2006 the United States of America closed a watercraft repair centre based in Hampshire. Mrs Nolan was employed at the Base by the appellant and was dismissed for redundancy the day before it closed. Mrs Nolan complained that the appellant had failed to consult with any employee representative when proposing to dismiss her.
Mrs Nolan's complaint was that the appellant as her employer, when proposing to dismiss her and other employees, had failed
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.