Lyttle and others v Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Limited [2015]
Posted In: Case Law-
Case Reference
Case C 182/13 -
Legal Body
Court of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ) -
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
Redundancy
This Northern Ireland case, which arose out of the closure of the Bonmarché chain of stores, had similarities with the 'Woolworths' case i.e. where collective redundancies take place, should each establishment or place of work be deemed to be a separate unit for consultation purposes or should all of the units be linked? The importance for the parties is the amount of time that employers are required to consult with employee representatives before effecting the redundancies - and the possibility of protective awards for affected employees should redundancies be 20 or more.
The CJEU referred to other judgements, particularly Rockfon (C 449/93, EU:C:1995:420), where "the term ‘establishment’
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.
Log in now to read the full articleDon't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Disclaimer:
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.