Ambisig v Nersant Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceCase C-601/13
Legal BodyCourt of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionContracts of Employment
By notice published on 24 November 2011, Nersant opened a public tendering procedure for the purchase of training and consultancy services. Article 5 of the contract notice stated that the contract would be awarded to the economically most advantageous tender, determined on the basis of the following factors:
A. Evaluation of the team — 40%
(i) This factor will be arrived at by taking into account the composition of the team, its proven experience and an analysis of the academic and professional background of its members.
B. Quality and merits of the service proposed — 55%
(i) Overall assessment of the proposed structure including the work programme — 0 to 20%.
(ii) Description of the
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.