Aidan Keenan v Walter Watson Ltd (CASE REF: 1648/14)Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyNorthern Ireland Industrial Tribunal (NIIT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal
The claimant was employed as a reinforcing operative. Initially, the claimant worked very well but reports were then made by his supervisors of performance and behavioural problems. Relevant alcohol misuse policy and procedure tests were then carried out with the consent of the claimant. Whilst he was suspended on full pay for 2 weeks, it was clear that the claimant wished to return to work and an occupational physician confirmed that the claimant was ‘fit to return to work without any adjustment’.
After much delay and then being suspended without pay the claimant wrote to the respondent stating that had ‘’no alternative but to resign’’ citing the company’s failure to pay him as a
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.