Paul McBurney v Vemac Engineering LimitedPosted In: Case Law
Legal BodyNorthern Ireland Industrial Tribunal (NIIT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The tribunal had made an earlier decision that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed and an order for compensation was made.
At this juncture the solicitor for the claimant made an application to the tribunal for costs, pursuant to Rules 38 and 40 of the Rules of Procedure on the grounds that the conducting of the proceedings by the respondent had been misconceived and/or had been conducted unreasonably. The representative later provided a schedule of costs.
In making his application for costs the claimant’s representative claimed that the respondent had, in conducting the proceedings acted otherwise unreasonably and/or the bringing or conducting by the respondent had no reasonable
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.