Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates van Winkelhof Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceUKSC 32
Legal BodyUK Supreme Court / House of Lords (UKSC/UKHL)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionWhistleblowing (Protected Disclosures)
Ms Bates van Winklehof was a solicitor and partner in the Limited Liability Partnership of Clyde & Co LLP for about a year until she was expelled from the partnership in January 2011. Part of the reasons for this detrimental treatment, she argued, was because she had made protected disclosures regarding bribery in Tanzania.
The firm, in turn, argued she had no protections under the whistleblowing legislation because she was not a 'worker', as required by the legislation. The Supreme Court has now ruled that a fixed-share equity partner can be a worker and the case on its substantive merits should now proceed to tribunal.
The Court found that the appellant fell under this definition of
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.