Ajar-Tech Ltd v Stack Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceUKEAT 0293/13/DA
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionA-Typical Working
This case illustrates the need for remuneration (or consideration of some kind) and certainty for a contract of employment to exist.
Mr Stack was an equal partner in a new audio/visual equipment business. He and the other two partners hoped to receive returns on their investment but the complainant did not receive wages for the work he did for the firm. Another partner, Mr Martin, did receive £60k per annum and had written terms of employment but, unlike Mr Stack, he had no other outside business interests and worked full time for the firm.
There were various documents showing Mr Stack’s role within the company and giving him different titles, such as “operations director” and
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, register today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.