Moran & Ors v Ideal Cleaning Services Ltd & Celanese Acetate Ltd Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionA-Typical Working
The Appellants were employed for 6-25 years by the first Respondent but placed by them to work as agency workers at the premises, and under the supervision, of the second Respondent or its predecessor. The Appellants sought to argue that they qualified for protection under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 and should be paid the same as equivalent permanent workers at Celanese Acetate Ltd.
The workers' contracts were open-ended and they were all long-term placements. The EAT has decided that a contract cannot be "temporary" if it has an open-ended duration period. To be covered by the legislation a temporary contract must be terminable by some other condition expiring e.g. the ending of a
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.